Evaluating Eligibility Rules Essay Example for Free

Evaluating Eligibility Rules try onIn determining which eligibility rules finish be associated with the Lakeland constabulary De ruinment, it the objectives of such institution must be looked into forwards going through the details in which such rules apply. The institution provides public and security measures to the community it holds. They sanction the welf are of the people around them under the parameters mandated by the law in the creation of such institution. With this, the eligibility rules that the internal representation uses revolves around the (1) eligibility by administrative rule and regulation, (2) eligibility by administrative delicacy and (3) eligibility by judicial decision. To show whether the eligibility rules advocated by the agency promotes a stigmatization, trade-offs or off-target benefits, each rule must be looked into in union to the application of such within the Lakeland Police Department. The eligibility by administrative rule and regulation s creates an advantage to client beneficiaries because it gives neighborly workers and other human service staff members a means by which to administer the benefit or service program evenhandedly and reliably, so that people exchangeablely situated are given similar benefits. (Chambers and Wedal, 2005, p. 112)This rule keep be seen to create trade-offs within the system of Lakeland Police Department. Trade-offs is evident because of the situational circumstances in which this rule can be applied to citizens within the district. There are implications of such applications in the counsel the police department processes the people. On the other hand, administrative rules restrict the freedom of staff members to use their discretion that is to judge need for the benefit or service in psyche circumstances. (Chambers and Wedal, 2005, p. 112) The next thing is the eligibility by administrative discretion.This discretion sees to it that all particular concerns within a system need to be address by the agency. All general organizational policies and administrative rules must be interpreted and applied to individual situations, so it is important to understand that such interpretation and applications necessarily involve significant personal conceit on the part of the staff member. (Chambers and Wedal, 2005, p. 14) With this, it can be seen that there is a stigmatization of benefits among members of the community handled by the Lakeland Police Department. Their capability to address situations of its citizens particularly concerning their welfare in accordance to the law and mandates of the city can clearly be seen.This creates benefits among locals on the assurance that their welfare is protected by the agency. Lastly, is the eligibility of judicial decision. This rule can also be seen as applicable to the Lakeland Police Department. After a program has been in mental process for a period of time, it is very likely that a contention will turf out about whet her the change legislation or whether an administrative rule or discretionary judgment was faithful to the spirit and endeavor of the law under which the program or policy was established. (Chambers and Wedal, 2005, p. 115) It can be seen that this categorization creates an important part of the Lakeland Police Academy. This creates a stigmatization of benefits among local citizenry.It may be true that the agency can set administrative discretion, however electrical outlets may arise between the proper execution and application of such scuttle among members of the community. This rule seeks to create a check-and-balance among the members of the police force. It is true that the objectives are in-line with the rules and mandates of the law, however, the tangible practice remains to be on the part of local enforcers and policeman. This creates a unverifiable interpretation of actions by enforcers that more often than not leads to judicial contention.Appeals to the judiciary fo r clarification of the law are routine and in the end they can bring as important as the legislation or administrative rules themselves. (Chambers and Wedal, 2005, p. 115) To determine whether there are lame rules in the system of Lakeland Police Department, the three eligibility rules again must be looked into. On the eligibility by administrative rule and regulation, there exists a problematic issue on how to effectively distinguish what are the diametric parameters for such actions.The agency may have difficulty in promoting the necessary measures present if such issue persists. Therefore, it is important to know whether a certain entitlement rule originates with judicial decisions, administrative rule, or individual staff discretion, for on that fact depends the probability of change staff decisions certainly are changed more easily than are formal rules and statutes. (Chambers and Wedal, 2005, p. 112) On the other hand, the two other eligibility rules are described to be minimal in problems.This is due to their ability to sink within the system and serve as both a check-and-balance among local authorities under the Lakewood Police Department and an initiative to further create changes that the department needs to address the changing needs of the future. Eligibility rules are characterized to create a foundation for actions by people. In the case of Lakewood Police Department, it seeks to cater the needs of the locals in promoting security and their welfare.In the issue of such eligibility rules being fair, it can be argued that they are indeed fair overall since it is based from the mandate of laws and legislation. The only issue here is the actual application of such rules by people who supposed to be fit for the description. Sometimes, there is a subjective interpretation of how such rules can be applied. This creates the sense of disparity of opinions and practices to both local and enforcers of such rules.On the other hand, tackling the issue o f sufficiency, yes, it can be argued that the rules applied during that time are sufficient to address the on-going need of the locals. However, it may not be the case in the future as new issues and challenges arise within the new system. That is why, changes in the system and rules are needed to further pursue the interests of people. For one, rules are and regulations are meant for the people to ensure their security and welfare within the community.